From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/22] selftests/vm: typecast the pkey register Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:58:16 -0700 Message-ID: <00081300-e891-3381-3acd-e3312e54fb58@intel.com> References: <1519264541-7621-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <1519264541-7621-5-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1519264541-7621-5-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ram Pai , shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, arnd@arndb.de List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 02/21/2018 05:55 PM, Ram Pai wrote: > -static inline unsigned int _rdpkey_reg(int line) > +static inline pkey_reg_t _rdpkey_reg(int line) > { > - unsigned int pkey_reg = __rdpkey_reg(); > + pkey_reg_t pkey_reg = __rdpkey_reg(); > > - dprintf4("rdpkey_reg(line=%d) pkey_reg: %x shadow: %x\n", > + dprintf4("rdpkey_reg(line=%d) pkey_reg: %016lx shadow: %016lx\n", > line, pkey_reg, shadow_pkey_reg); > assert(pkey_reg == shadow_pkey_reg); Hmm. So we're using %lx for an int? Doesn't the compiler complain about this?