Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmhps-00043R-07 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 06:36:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmhpl-0006Jp-Ub for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 06:36:11 -0500 Received: from mail.ispras.ru ([83.149.199.45]:50554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xmhpl-0006JO-Gk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 06:36:05 -0500 From: "Pavel Dovgaluk" References: <20141107103123.6136.18545.stgit@PASHA-ISP> <20141107103207.6136.22294.stgit@PASHA-ISP> <545CAAC0.7060904@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <545CAAC0.7060904@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:36:08 +0300 Message-ID: <003b01cffa7f$06618a40$13249ec0$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: ru Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 07/25] icount: implement icount requesting List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: 'Paolo Bonzini' , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, mark.burton@greensocs.com, real@ispras.ru, batuzovk@ispras.ru, maria.klimushenkova@ispras.ru, afaerber@suse.de, fred.konrad@greensocs.com > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com] > On 07/11/2014 11:32, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: > > Replay uses number of executed instructions to determine corrent events > > injection moments. This patch introduces new function for querying the > > instructions counter. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk > > --- > > cpus.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > include/qemu/timer.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c > > index 7e8c507..2ec6d75 100644 > > --- a/cpus.c > > +++ b/cpus.c > > @@ -136,8 +136,7 @@ typedef struct TimersState { > > > > static TimersState timers_state; > > > > -/* Return the virtual CPU time, based on the instruction counter. */ > > -static int64_t cpu_get_icount_locked(void) > > +static int64_t cpu_get_instructions_counter_locked(void) > > { > > int64_t icount; > > CPUState *cpu = current_cpu; > > @@ -145,10 +144,31 @@ static int64_t cpu_get_icount_locked(void) > > icount = timers_state.qemu_icount; > > if (cpu) { > > if (!cpu_can_do_io(cpu)) { > > - fprintf(stderr, "Bad clock read\n"); > > + fprintf(stderr, "Bad icount read\n"); > > + exit(1); > > } > > icount -= (cpu->icount_decr.u16.low + cpu->icount_extra); > > } > > + return icount; > > +} > > + > > +int64_t cpu_get_instructions_counter(void) > > +{ > > + /* This function calls are synchnonized to timer changes, > > + calling cpu_get_instructions_counter_locked without lock is safe */ > > + int64_t icount = timers_state.qemu_icount; > > + CPUState *cpu = current_cpu; > > + > > + if (cpu) { > > + icount -= (cpu->icount_decr.u16.low + cpu->icount_extra); > > + } > > + return icount; > > +} > > This is the same as Frederic's QEMU_CLOCK_ICOUNT clock, right? Any > reason why one is better than the other? Not really. Frederic's QEMU_CLOCK_ICOUNT is measured in nanoseconds. And this counter is measured in instructions. Pavel Dovgalyuk