From: "Jesse Huang" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] IP100A, add end of pci id table Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:28:49 +0800 Message-ID: <005b01c6c4d1$eb2aaf90$4964a8c0@icplus.com.tw> References: <1155841247.4532.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44E480FA.70806@pobox.com> <02d101c6c28a$7c19d160$4964a8c0@icplus.com.tw> <44E59FF1.6090703@pobox.com> Cc: , , Return-path: Received: from msr51.hinet.net ([168.95.4.151]:45241 "EHLO msr51.hinet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932098AbWHUD3O (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:29:14 -0400 To: "Jeff Garzik" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Jeff: Ok, I see. I will resend all of the patches after I finish modify. Thanks. Jesse ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Garzik" To: "Jesse Huang" Cc: ; ; Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 7:09 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] IP100A, add end of pci id table Jesse Huang wrote: > Hi Jeff: > > Sorry for that. I will remove those. Am I need to resent all of those > patch or send all in one patch? Normally, when I merged a patch, you will receive a one-word reply "applied" or "merged". Or for a series of patches, "applies patches 1-6". For this series of patches, you will need to resend the entire patchset, modified with the comments so far. It is quite normal for some patchsets to undergo several iterations before being merged, when engineering review highlights issues. Thanks and regards, Jeff