Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9L9acV23755 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:36:38 -0400 Received: from sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91.asp.att.net [63.240.76.165]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9L9aWuK030221 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:36:32 -0400 Received: from randy.randyperkins.com ([192.168.0.200]) by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EStDc-0007Xp-QQ for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:29:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Reducing ext3 LV From: Randy Perkins In-Reply-To: <43588EDC.1040001@snow.email.ne.jp> References: <43572E5D.1010803@snow.email.ne.jp> <1129844206.25448.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43588EDC.1040001@snow.email.ne.jp> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:29:50 -0500 Message-Id: <1129886990.2841.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 15:46 +0900, Mark Sargent wrote: > > > me neither...quick question, though..the HOWTO says, see below, that the > e2fsadm doesn't exist in LVM2. Were you using LVM1.? yes i was. I mentioned that in my original post, but forgot when i replied to you. randy