Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5GFIXZR014367 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:18:33 -0400 Received: from zoot.lnxi.com (66.239.25.20.ptr.us.xo.net [66.239.25.20]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5GFIX65002987 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:18:33 -0400 From: Joshua Aune Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:18:07 -0600 Message-Id: <1150471087.30257.393.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] Effects of XXremove and then XXcreate on fs Reply-To: luken@omner.org, LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development If an LV is [lv,vg,pv]removed and then re[pv,vg,lv]created not using the backup file, what are the effects on the old LV? is it possible to remove the new created LV/VG/PV and recreate using the backup file and still access the volume? or is there some on-disk metadata from the original LV that got hosed by the creation of the new LV? I am trying to recover a system that had the above done to it along with possibly having some other problems, and am trying to weed out possible causes of failure. I do have the backup/ file now and will be attempting this as soon as I can restore the block devices from backups (another 6 hours). As far as I can tell the LV/VG/PVs were not resized or changed at all from the time it was created to the time the underlying hardware crashed... Are there any gotcha's trying to do this? Thanks, Josh