Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k78F1frf015890 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:01:41 -0400 Received: from omner.org (www.omner.org [64.79.194.221]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k78F1Ylf020628 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:01:35 -0400 Received: from omner.org (vps.omner.org [127.0.0.1]) by omner.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD695863C130 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.119] (cpe-66-87-227-104.ut.sprintbbd.net [66.87.227.104]) by omner.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E77D863C12F for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Running LVM on shared LUNs From: Joshua Aune In-Reply-To: <200608080050.42004.peregrine@openbrainstem.net> References: <1154987972.16651.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200608080050.42004.peregrine@openbrainstem.net> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:01:50 -0600 Message-Id: <1155049310.16651.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 00:50 -0600, Lamont R. Peterson wrote: > > The million dollar question is, can system1 and system2 > simultaneously > > have both of the VGs active without hosing any data? ^^ lvm metadata > > As I understand it, only if you are using a filesystem that supports > clustered operations, like GFS. > Just to be clear, I should be able to issue [lv|vg]change -ay on both systems simultaneously with no LVM corruption (data integrity will be maintained by not starting a filesystems on both nodes simultaneously) (as long as I don't start the filesystem on both nodes). I would use something like GFS, but this is a HA setup for Lustre oss/mds nodes :) Thanks again, Josh