From: benh@kernel.crashing.org (Benjamin Herrenschmidt)
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:07:15 +0000
Subject: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] Apple Motion Sensor driver
Message-Id: <1155118036.4040.77.camel@localhost.localdomain>
List-Id: <lm-sensors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20060802191520.GA2260@hansmi.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20060802191520.GA2260@hansmi.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 23:49 +0200, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 05:39:32PM -0300, Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho wrote:
> > > This guarantees a minimum wait time of 5msec after writing the value.
> > > Looking at the specs[1], this should be done. Your code doesn't do that:
> 
> > I doubt that if it's possible to retrying after a fail the hardware will
> > bother if we try to do the first read in less than 5ms... but here it
> > goes. two versions, feel free to choose.
> 
> The specs are written based on the Mac OS X driver, and I think Apple
> knows their hardware.

Don't be so sure :)

> After discussing both variants, Ren? Nussbaumer and myself prefer the
> first one.
> 
> Acked-by: Michael Hanselmann <linux-kernel at hansmi.ch>
> Acked-by: Ren? Nussbaumer <linux-kernel at killerfox.forkbomb.ch>
> 
> Greets,
> Michael