From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <46763C3D.3080005@domain.hid> References: <464814D9.8070700@domain.hid> <1179135141.5045.53.camel@domain.hid> <46763C3D.3080005@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:28:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1182256090.6569.26.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Philippe Gerum Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Adeos for Linux 2.6.19 PowerPC kernels. Reply-To: rpm@xenomai.org List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Benjamin ZORES Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 10:03 +0200, Benjamin ZORES wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > FWIW, I've almost finished an I-pipe port over 2.6.21 also using the > > arch/powerpc tree. It relies on the genirq layer which makes things way > > more comfortable, and which does not require to redefine particular ack > > routines but rather keep the original irqchip handlers. > > > > > Hello Philippe, > > Do you have any news about the 2.6.21 port ? > Is there something that can be tested ? > > This should get better when the I-pipe/powerpc development is merged > > into the main git repo here, which should happen in a reasonable future: > > http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ipipe-2.6.git;a=summary > > > > > There's not much about PowerPC arch changes right there. > Is the development stuck ? :-( > > Thanks for any news. Highest priority goes to closing the merge window before 2.4-rc1 which mostly consists of integrating all generic core changes, and we are already late on this. 2.6.21/powerpc will be there for 2.4 final; but since we do have a decent 2.6.19/ppc support available already, the former will have to wait because it is not on the critical path - AFAIC, that is. -- Philippe.