From: Tom Tucker Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] svc: Modify svc_xprt_create to take a sockaddr Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:22:53 -0600 Message-ID: <1200939773.11003.53.camel@trinity.ogc.int> References: <20080121171105.29028.61809.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> <9ECEB764-A93C-4DF2-BB6E-273C33C02B6E@oracle.com> <1200938366.25562.14.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Chuck Lever , bfields@fieldses.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from 209-198-142-2-host.prismnet.net ([209.198.142.2]:49178 "EHLO smtp.opengridcomputing.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751237AbYAUSP3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:15:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1200938366.25562.14.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 12:59 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 12:47 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > > > This is sort of a generic question. > > > > The server-side interface appears to be using strings to identify > > transports ("tcp"), but the client-side is still using numbers > > (XPRT_TRANSPORT_TCP). There are one or two sticky issues to fix > > before the client-side can use strings, but... > > We already have to parse the mount string in the NFS code. Why on earth > would we want to have a second parser for the same thing in the RPC > code? > I don't. Oversight on my part....I'll recode with the existing functions... > Trond > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html