Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec based hibernation: a prototype of kexec
	multi-stage load
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <m1lk2bs970.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
References: <1210574441.30365.8.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
	<20080513053408.GA5870@redhat.com>
	<1210730266.23707.50.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
	<20080514025607.GA19944@redhat.com>
	<1210736275.23707.62.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
	<m1lk2c4l4i.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
	<1210827473.23707.133.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
	<m1lk2bs970.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:41:54 +0800
Message-ID: <1210902114.23707.156.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org
Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 11:39 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
[...]
> 2) After we figure out our address read the stack pointer from
>    a fixed location and simply set it.  (This is my preference)

Just for confirmation (My English is poor).

Do you mean that kernel A just read the stack top as re-entry point,
regardless of whether it is return address or argument 1?

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec