From: Bob Peterson Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:48:10 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/18] [try #2] DLM: dlm patches need review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1306131809.11085920.1505393290137.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- Original Message ----- | Hi, | | | On 12/09/17 09:54, tsutomu.owa at toshiba.co.jp wrote: | > Hi, | > | > This series of patches (2nd version after previous review on August) is to | > fix various bugs. This patch set is against the mainline kernel. | > We'd like reviewed to make sure those changes are fine. | > | > Patch number 01/02/03 were posted on this mailing list. | > However, I've modifed 03 to correct a bug that aquires rwlock multiple | > times. | > Other than that, there is no changes. | > | > 01: | > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2017-April/msg00021.html | > 02: | > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2017-August/msg00076.html | > 03: | > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2017-April/msg00023.html | > | > thanks in advance. | > -- owa | > | > | | Many thanks for sending the updated patches. Since the merge window is | currently open, we are at a good point to look at these, since there is | maximum time before the next merge window. Perhaps one way to deal with | these patches would be to take the ones that we are most confident in | now (of course that could be all of them!) and postpone any that we | think might need more review until later. That way it should be easier | to review the more complicated patches and we get the benefit of the | easier to review patches sooner. | | Dave, Bob, does that make sense? | | Steve. Hi, Yes, sounds okay to me. Bob Peterson