From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/8] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficient to call early Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:45:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1318405548.3968.7.camel@twins> References: <619c66d6da63aa086e2eac017e7aed216cc8ddc3.1317755691.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> <8762k4grwy.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20111010073405.GC29035@elte.hu> <4E934F37.2020300@goop.org> <20111012073402.GJ18618@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111012073402.GJ18618@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Rusty Russell , Steven Rostedt , "David S. Miller" , David Daney , Michael Ellerman , Jan Glauber , Jason Baron , the arch/x86 maintainers , Xen Devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 09:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > If it has Jason's and PeterZ's ack then it can go via any other tree > in this cycle - we are not carrying jump label patches right now. I don't seem to have them in my inbox, just one or two patches of a larger series.