From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V4 10/10] jump-label: initialize jump-label subsystem much earlier Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:02:00 +0200 Message-ID: <1318935720.21167.15.camel@twins> References: <1318502628.24856.10.camel@twins> <4E98AEDD.4010503@goop.org> <1318668158.6594.0.camel@twins> <4E9A38FA.7030504@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E9A38FA.7030504@goop.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Steven Rostedt , "David S. Miller" , David Daney , Michael Ellerman , Jan Glauber , Jason Baron , the arch/x86 maintainers , Xen Devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 18:52 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 10/15/2011 01:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 14:51 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> How about this? Proper comment and much earlier init. > > Looks good to me, thanks! > > Should I take that as an ACK on the series? Yes, I don't see any problems with it, Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra