From: Shuah Khan Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:40:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT RESEND linux-next] sparc: dma-mapping: support debug_dma_mapping_error Message-Id: <1351287624.6885.4.camel@lorien2> List-Id: References: <1351211909.6851.26.camel@lorien2> <1351267989.4013.20.camel@lorien2> <20121026.150153.1335892148865957561.davem@davemloft.net> <20121026.151055.328093458246032481.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20121026.151055.328093458246032481.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Miller Cc: kyungmin.park@samsung.com, arnd@arndb.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, sam@ravnborg.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuahkhan@gmail.com On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 15:10 -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:01:53 -0400 (EDT) > > > From: Shuah Khan > > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:13:09 -0600 > > > >> Add support for debug_dma_mapping_error() call to avoid warning from > >> debug_dma_unmap() interface when it checks for mapping error checked > >> status. Without this patch, device driver failed to check map error > >> warning is generated. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan > > > > Why are you resending this? > > > > When you resend patches, you have to give a reason. Did the patch > > change? Are you updating the CC: list of the patch posting? Are > > you correcting something else? > > In fact you sent this _3_ times. Please, don't do this, or at least > explain why you are reposting something each time. I am really sorry for the noise. I forgot to mark this explicitly for linux-next the first time and this patch depends on a patch that went into linux-next. I sent a few patches for several architectures and lost track. I meant to add explanation before I hit send. The reason for resend is to tag it for linux-next. -- Shuah