From: shc_work@mail.ru (=?UTF-8?B?QWxleGFuZGVyIFNoaXlhbg==?=) Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 14:31:41 +0400 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmVbMl06IFtQQVRDSF0gQVJNOiBkdHM6IGlteDI3IHBoeUNBUkQtUyByZW1v?= =?UTF-8?B?dmUgd3JvbmcgSTJDIFJUQw==?= In-Reply-To: <20130707102207.GI16871@s25.your-server.de> References: <1372782469.486055292@f129.mail.ru> <1373100718.107651915@f159.i.mail.ru> <20130707102207.GI16871@s25.your-server.de> Message-ID: <1373193101.622550139@f60.mail.ru> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 12:51:58PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > > Fixup of commit 7874d595b78e431f0f661d2fe47625649308a52e > > > "ARM: dts: Add device tree support for phycard pca100". > > > > > > Remove wrong I2C RTC node. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann > > > --- > > > > > > Thanks, Alexander, you are right. I2C2 has no RTC. > > ... > > > > There are a couple of comments on this file. > > > > I think that the OWIRE should be moved to the RDK. > > I moved OWIRE and i2c1 to RDK. Both are not used on the SOM. > > > ioexpander must contain "gpio-controller" at least, and for use it further, > > it is necessary to define the label for this node. > > I checked all I2C devices in the board schematics. There is actually no > ioexpander. I don't know why it was added. I will send some I2C patches > later. Perhaps the chip is mounted on the camera module. A similar IC is exist on PCM-970 camera addon device. If so, the device should also be moved to RDK. ---