From: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mtd: ubi: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:51:14 +0300 Message-ID: <1413813074.7906.294.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> References: <1413296037-22346-1-git-send-email-tlinder@codeaurora.org> <543D304C.5000607@codeaurora.org> <1413297205.3269.11.camel@joe-AO725> <1413299231.7906.101.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <1413302724.3269.18.camel@joe-AO725> Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:25037 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752536AbaJTNv2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:51:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1413302724.3269.18.camel@joe-AO725> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Tanya Brokhman , ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Richard Weinberger , open list On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 09:05 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > It's pretty trivial when all the lines are already > being touched. OK, but then the same change should done in UBIFS, because it's ubifs_msg() and so on macros are consistent with UBI macros. So I think if this is done, then it is done separately for both UBI and UBIFS. Artem.