From: Ian Campbell Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:34:40 +0000 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] exynos5250/arndale: Enable SATA/AHCI support. In-Reply-To: References: <1412690172.4972.31.camel@hellion.org.uk> <1412690200-6630-1-git-send-email-ijc@hellion.org.uk> Message-ID: <1414578880.29975.11.camel@hellion.org.uk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 16:27 +0900, Minkyu Kang wrote: > Dear Ian Campbell, > > On 7 October 2014 22:56, Ian Campbell wrote: > From: Ian Campbell > > This is based on some old patches from the chromeos-v2011.12 > branch of > http://git.chromium.org/chromiumos/third_party/u-boot.git by > Taylor Hutt. > Specifically: > > http://git.chromium.org/gitweb/?p=chromiumos/third_party/u-boot.git;a=commit;h=26f6c570b5deb37c52306920ae049203c68f014a > exynos: sata: on-board controller initialization > Signed-off-by: Taylor Hutt > > http://git.chromium.org/gitweb/?p=chromiumos/third_party/u-boot.git;a=commit;h=d8cac5cf0b63df00d2d6ac7df814613e4b60b9d1 > exynos: sata: Add sata_initialize() interface > Signed-off-by: Taylor Hutt > > http://git.chromium.org/gitweb/?p=chromiumos/third_party/u-boot.git;a=commit;h=dd32462453d6328bc5770859d1b56501f7920d7d > exynos: sata: SATA self-configuration for when SATA device > is enabled > Signed-off-by: Taylor Hutt > > As well as rebasing there have been some significant changes. > > - Drop support for smdk5250, which I don't own. > - Implement support for arndale, which I do. > - Since arndale has no need to frob a GPIO on SATA init drop > the associated > code. > - Initialise via the existing scsi_init hook rather than > introducing > sata_initialize, associated build system and > include/configs/*.h changes. > - Use set/clrbits in a bunch of places > - Add some #defines for some magic numbers. > > This relies on "ahci: Don't start command DMA engine before > buffers are set" > > NOTE: For some reason when running u-boot with this patch > Linux is unable to > correct probe devices. See the next patch for an attempt at a > hack/workaround. > Any ideas would be appreciated. > > > So, is it RFC? or not? This patch is, so far as I know, OK wrt the functionality it tries to enable (i.e. sata access from u-boot), but there is a caveat wrt launching Linux afterwards, which I obviously expect means it cannot be applied as is. I have requested any help/ideas you may have. So, do you have advice/ideas on the issue I raised? > Why you tied up this RFC patch? ([U-Boot,2/2] HACK: arndale: deinit > scsi before launching Linux) I'm afraid I don't understand this question. > +void * const phy_ctrl = (void *)SATA_PHCTRL_APB; > +void * const phy_i2c_base = (void *)SATA_PHY_I2C_ABP; > > > we don't allow direct access to the register. > please refer to other driver. There seem to be plenty of drivers in u-boot which use this pattern. Perhaps you could be more specific about what you would like to be done here? [...] > please remove blank line. I'll fix up all the coding style issues before reposting. Ian.