From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] Testing cpupools: recipe for it and job definition Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:29:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1418923754.10854.25.camel@Abyss.station> References: <20141218130919.29909.13566.stgit@Abyss.station> <20141218133902.29909.99057.stgit@Abyss.station> <5492EBFC.8010005@suse.com> <20141218150409.GA2870@zion.uk.xensource.com> <5492EE60.5090005@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6703313783915669567==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5492EE60.5090005@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Juergen Gross Cc: George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============6703313783915669567== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yRhIYXHNuVOqTIOSkbyS" --=-yRhIYXHNuVOqTIOSkbyS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 16:10 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 12/18/2014 04:04 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:00:12PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > >> On 12/18/2014 02:39 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > >>> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli > >>> --- > >>> make-flight | 11 +++++++++++ > >>> sg-run-job | 6 ++++++ > >>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/make-flight b/make-flight > >>> index a91f256..ce02c89 100755 > >>> --- a/make-flight > >>> +++ b/make-flight > >>> @@ -266,6 +266,16 @@ do_credit2_tests () { > >>> $debian_runvars all_hostflags=3D$most_hostflags > >>> } > >>> > >>> +do_cpupools_tests () { > >>> + if [ $xenarch !=3D amd64 -o $dom0arch !=3D amd64 ]; then > >>> + return > >>> + fi > >> > >> Why can't you test cpupools on x86_64? > >> > > > > Don't worry. That's the name used for 64 bit (be it amd or intel) in > > OSSTest. :-) >=20 Exactly, it comes from the Debian arches names. > Aargh. Some automatic filter in my brain translated this to arm64 :-) >=20 HeHe :-) > So: Why can't you test cpupools on ARM? >=20 We certainly can. ARM testing via OSSTest is a still experimental, AFAIUI. I don't even know if we have the hardware, yet, as I think the "rack" of ARM dev board IanC was working on will be setup in the new testing COLO, rather than in current OSSTest pool of hardware (someone correct me if I'm wrong). However, that seems to be taken into account by the fact that, in make-flight, in test_matrix_do_one(), after only 2 jobs are created (the basic debian one and a libvirt one) we have this: # No further arm tests at the moment if [ $dom0arch =3D armhf ]; then return fi So, yes, I guess I can get rid of such filters in my new function, so that, when ARM maintainers will disable the safety catch above, a job will actually be generated. I'll give it a shot for v2. Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-yRhIYXHNuVOqTIOSkbyS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlSTDusACgkQk4XaBE3IOsT1YwCdHkKEJ+l8AD4+mD3IsBG2runQ mwAAnirfH0h7U7ElnO28BsIu43cg9i4Z =nP/k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yRhIYXHNuVOqTIOSkbyS-- --===============6703313783915669567== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============6703313783915669567==--