From: Toshi Kani Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 1/2] x86: add support for the non-standard protected e820 type Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 12:23:05 -0600 Message-ID: <1428344585.31093.136.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> References: <1427872339-6688-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1427872339-6688-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1428077687.31093.120.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> <1428094444.31093.122.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> <20150404094054.GA21027@gmail.com> <1428341356.31093.133.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ingo Molnar , Christoph Hellwig , linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers , Jens Axboe To: Yinghai Lu Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 11:26 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Toshi Kani wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 11:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > OK, I will send a patch for the fix, with suggested update from > > Christoph of not to re-add 'type' argument to e820_end_pfn(). > > > > Yinghai, I will add your sign-off to the patch. Let me know if you have > > any concern. > > I think we should restore all to original. > > e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type) > e820_end_of_ram_pfn > e820_end_of_low_ram_pfn > > otherwise it will cause confusing, because last two really have ram_pfn, > and the first one does not has ram in the function name. Good point. I will revert back to the original. Thanks, -Toshi