From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:25:07 +0100
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 7/8] cfg80211: Add Kconfig option for
 ITS-G5 band (5.9 GHz)
In-Reply-To: <87d1uw31r1.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
References: <1448303241-27747-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
	<1448303241-27747-8-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
	<1448560529.2167.43.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	<87d1uw31r1.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
Message-ID: <1448612707.2531.1.camel@sipsolutions.net>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 22:10 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
>?
> Because in [1] Jouni said that
> 
> ???"kernel config option + custom regdb would certainly be much
> closer to what I'd like to see from the regulatory enforcement view
> point"
> 
> I also like the fact that the help text mentions the relevant
> regulatory documents. I guess the users would appreciate that.
> 

Fair enough, but I'm not really convinced that the Kconfig option is
needed for what Jouni really required.

In any case, I spoke with him yesterday and we don't think that your
patches are going to work as is - we'll need to change the regulatory
flags it seems. I'll comment more specifically on the patches.

johannes