From: Joe Perches Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 20:03:04 +0000 Subject: Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm Message-Id: <1449172984.12092.0.camel@perches.com> List-Id: References: <20151203130525.GB4164@mrl.redhat.com> <566098BD.6010803@akamai.com> In-Reply-To: <566098BD.6010803@akamai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jason Baron , Aaron Conole , Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet , syzkaller , Vladislav Yasevich , linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev , Kostya Serebryany , Alexander Potapenko , Sasha Levin On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): [] > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic > 'really_no_printk()' macro. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231