From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs: show pipe inode in mount options
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:43:06 +0800
Message-ID: <1454388186.3382.1.camel@themaw.net>
References: <20151216120222.19097.54512.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
	 <568E8840.3010801@odin.com> <1452237640.2973.19.camel@themaw.net>
	 <568F9D85.6070601@odin.com> <1452257913.7030.25.camel@themaw.net>
	 <568FD028.5090207@odin.com> <1452303110.3067.29.camel@themaw.net>
	 <5693931F.9070101@odin.com> <56A213CA.5090704@odin.com>
	 <1453509017.3042.7.camel@themaw.net>
	 <20160126101907.388686e7@canb.auug.org.au>
	 <20160125154834.3afe2ede52d0342b61120943@linux-foundation.org>
	 <1453780556.3067.15.camel@themaw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <1453780556.3067.15.camel@themaw.net>
Sender: autofs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: skinsbursky@virtuozzo.com, criu@openvz.org, autofs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:55 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:48 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:19:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <
> > sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Ian,
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 08:30:17 +0800 Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I haven't had anything significant enough for autofs to warrant
> > > > maintaining a tree and sending push requests so I'll need to ask
> > > > Stephen what I need to do (perhaps you could offer some advise on
> > > > that
> > > > now Stephen, please).
> > > 
> > > I guess if its just a few patches every now and then, then Andrew
> > > Morton may be the best person to shepherd them upstream.
> > 
> > yup, send 'em along.
> > 
> > I actually was handling the autofs4 stuff back in 2014 for a bit.
> 
> Thanks Andrew.
> 
> Last time I tried to send the module rename series we got confused some
> how, patches not seen leading to conflicts in applying later patches
> IIRC, which lead to the recommendation I send them to linux-next.
> 
> The series has grown a bit too now but I'm thinking I should send them
> in smaller groups, such as coding style fixes and white space fixes,
> change to use pr* logging, etc.
> 
> Hopefully that will make the process much more straight forward.
> 
> The thing is the patches are mostly not urgent which is why I keep
> postponing sending them when higher priority things come up.
> 
> As for the patch from Stanislav, I'll put that at the top of my patch
> queue, have a quick look at it and send it over so that, hopefully, it
> can get merged.
> 
> I'll probably send a couple of others too to get things going on with
> (what I'm calling) the module rename series.

Hi Andrew,

I've sent the first bunch of patches to get this change started, including
 Stanislav's patch.

Thanks
Ian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in