From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 13:50:53 -0800
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/16] mmc: sdhci-omap: Add SPDX identifier
In-Reply-To: <20180205125029.21570-16-kishon@ti.com>
References: <20180205125029.21570-1-kishon@ti.com>
 <20180205125029.21570-16-kishon@ti.com>
Message-ID: <1517867453.7489.261.camel@perches.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

(Adding Kate Stewart)

On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 18:20 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand,

As far as I know that "legally binding" bit is unproven.
So maybe, maybe not.

I don't doubt that it should be added, but I would be
hesitant to state in a commit message that it is
legally binding.

> which can be used
> instead of the full boiler plate text.

I would also be hesitant to remove existing license text.