From: Jan Stancek Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 03:21:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] lib/tst_test: Report 0 if test has both TPASS and TCONF In-Reply-To: <20170907155745.9116-1-chrubis@suse.cz> References: <20170907155745.9116-1-chrubis@suse.cz> Message-ID: <1529683625.10671733.1504855289141.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it ----- Original Message ----- > It's probably a bit more logical to report a succes if only part of the > test was skipped and the rest was sucessful. That way we can distinguish > tests that were compiled-out completely or where the kernel does not > support the particular syscall at all. The difference is about 15 > testcases that report TPASS instead of TCONF after this change. Looks good to me. I've noticed more TCONFs too with your all_filesystems patch, where some filesystems didn't support all features. Regards, Jan