Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3557BC4332E for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 19:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0F6206F8 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 19:06:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584990370; bh=NXOPK+Mv+aJKUDziUQYyLN4KsEg7mSRWi5G6/f9QwyQ=; h=Subject:To:From:Date:List-ID:From; b=VTFwljwPfcAFW4tB7W+9jQtoC254gmkUo18AEUezmTAVN4uSvsZEzlcaeHmOcgMJ1 OVYE2Xs5WXBZHu5d4JROB2YYY1u0ySsymP34c2YuOi6XkN4uXNOq282l97cO4+EgM2 ehmo0hXR0mQQEm0T3LdXrl2BcBMlYLJ3Oakj9G3Q= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727570AbgCWTGJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2020 15:06:09 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55102 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727564AbgCWTGJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2020 15:06:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B3362051A; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 19:06:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584990368; bh=NXOPK+Mv+aJKUDziUQYyLN4KsEg7mSRWi5G6/f9QwyQ=; h=Subject:To:From:Date:From; b=BBb5I8OtwJzcvIjXVfOGL66sigUqINT17UQQL1jcgipzrjxJCGKDASOpqzF2MtyUi L53BvLI8gLt53w2h8iiVtEveButPKkEtMPWDbiIDiJ244dsBNCj4y88vPfVpHwtpOh 2oyyPmulp67mxFuhx+hLiAVLD7T23O368oP33YrQ= Subject: patch "nvmem: sprd: Fix the block lock operation" added to char-misc-testing To: freeman.liu@unisoc.com, baolin.wang7@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org From: Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 20:06:06 +0100 Message-ID: <158499036612077@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled nvmem: sprd: Fix the block lock operation to my char-misc git tree which can be found at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git in the char-misc-testing branch. The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree (usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.) The patch will be merged to the char-misc-next branch sometime soon, after it passes testing, and the merge window is open. If you have any questions about this process, please let me know. From c66ebde4d988b592e8f0008e04c47cc4950a49d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Freeman Liu Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 15:00:03 +0000 Subject: nvmem: sprd: Fix the block lock operation According to the Spreadtrum eFuse specification, we should write 0 to the block to trigger the lock operation. Fixes: 096030e7f449 ("nvmem: sprd: Add Spreadtrum SoCs eFuse support") Cc: stable Signed-off-by: Freeman Liu Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323150007.7487-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c b/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c index 2f1e0fbd1901..7a189ef52333 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static int sprd_efuse_raw_prog(struct sprd_efuse *efuse, u32 blk, bool doub, ret = -EBUSY; } else { sprd_efuse_set_prog_lock(efuse, lock); - writel(*data, efuse->base + SPRD_EFUSE_MEM(blk)); + writel(0, efuse->base + SPRD_EFUSE_MEM(blk)); sprd_efuse_set_prog_lock(efuse, false); } -- 2.25.2