Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908FEC433DB for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3700864E57 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229555AbhBSQu3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:50:29 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39068 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229527AbhBSQu3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:50:29 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECBCABAE; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] oslat: Fix --cpu-list won't allow to schedule on all possible cores To: Peter Xu Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Clark Williams , John Kacur , Pradipta Kumar Sahoo , Mike Stowell References: <20210218192729.116427-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20210219081611.xsugonlz7dl4zhvx@beryllium.lan> <20210219152417.GE6669@xz-x1> <20210219162019.giw2yy25vjuzc56f@beryllium.lan> <20210219163930.GG6669@xz-x1> From: Daniel Wagner Message-ID: <16b412ed-eaad-e305-faee-709eb75f79cf@suse.de> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:49:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210219163930.GG6669@xz-x1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Hi Peter, On 19.02.21 17:39, Peter Xu wrote: > Now I tried to fix it but it seems you don't really like my fix. Sorry I didn't want to say I don't like your fix. I just said, I would appreciate if things would stay consistent. But then it seems there is not much interest in this. > Would you propose yours instead? I would be more than glad if your version is > better then I'm happy to drop mine. Otherwise I'll still prefer to have this > patch merged to unbreak it first. I don't care too much. If this patch fixes your problem don't let me stop you. Thanks, Daniel