From: Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@apm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH]Device tree update for the 460ex DWC SATA<resubmission>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:26:40 +0530
Message-ID: <1b881e5f50cb8c104fcbe11778cdbbdf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006041003.o54A3CIi024533@amcc.com>
	<20100606184748.GC7801@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100606184748.GC7801@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, sr@denx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

Hi Josh,

There was a suggestion from Sergei, I incorporated and resubmitted.

Regards,
Rup

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Boyer [mailto:jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:18 AM
To: Rupjyoti Sarmah
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; sr@denx.de; rsarmah@apm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Device tree update for the 460ex DWC
SATA<resubmission>

On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:33:12PM +0530, Rupjyoti Sarmah wrote:
>
>Device tree update for the Applied micro processor 460ex on-chip SATA
>Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>

You sent this same patch twice.  Mistake, or was there supposed to be a
difference?

josh
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, =

is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information=
=A0
that is confidential and proprietary to AppliedMicro Corporation or its sub=
sidiaries. =

It is to be used solely for the purpose of furthering the parties' business=
 relationship. =

All unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. =

If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e=
-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.