Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 07:59:10 -0400 From: Peter Green Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM and sw RAID1 Message-ID: <20000824075910.C7996@gospelcom.net> References: <20000823162957.B8398@gospelcom.net> <20000824111944.A974@guldukat.muon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20000824111944.A974@guldukat.muon>; from nils@muon.de on Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 11:19:44AM +0200 Sender: owner-linux-lvm Errors-To: owner-linux-lvm List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@msede.com also sprach nils: > On Wed, 23.08.00, Peter Green wrote: > > (pcg@dmna) ~> uname -a > > Linux dmna 2.4.0-0.21 #2 Wed Aug 23 11:46:12 EDT 2000 i686 unknown > > I'm a bit confused. Shouldnt the kernel-version be something like > "2.4.0-testN" instead of "2.4.0-0.21"? It's a RedHat kernel from rawhide. > I for one am using 2.4.0-test5 with LVM 0.8final on sw-Raid Lv.5 wihout any > problems so far, my pvcreate behaved like it should. Hrm, I might try the stock kernel instead. Usually, RedHat does fairly good things with any patches they add to their kernel, but this might be a case in which they've done something naughty. Thanks for the pointers! /pg -- Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : pcg@gospelcom.net --- /* * Oops. The kernel tried to access some bad page. We'll have to * terminate things with extreme prejudice. */ die_if_kernel("Oops", regs, error_code); (From linux/arch/i386/mm/fault.c)