From: Tobias Klausmann Subject: UFS maintainer and a bug in ufs/super.c Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:04:22 +0200 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20020417100422.GB1322@tuts.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Hi! First off: Is Daniel Pirkl still the official UFS maintainer? If not whom do I send the stuff below to? I tried to contact Daniel but haven't heard back from him in a while. The list archives contain another message by someone who was seeking out the UFS maintainer but never got an answer. The problem is this: Read support for UFS assumes that fs_bsize is one of 4096, 8192, 32768. Now this worked for a long time, but recently, FreeBSD ships with a newfs(8) that uses a fs_bsize of 16384 by default. I don't know why 16834 is omitted in ufs/super.c, but inserting the numbers in the appropriate places at least fixes read support. Given the thoroughly experimental nature of write support, I didn't try to mess with that. So, whom do I send the patch to? Greets, Tobias -- Eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow we diet.