From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: UFS maintainer and a bug in ufs/super.c
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:07:32 +0100
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20020430110732.A8423@infradead.org>
References: <20020417100422.GB1322@tuts.net> <20020430100602.GA29392@tuts.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
To: Tobias Klausmann <klausman@tuts.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020430100602.GA29392@tuts.net>; from klausman@tuts.net on Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 12:06:02PM +0200
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 12:06:02PM +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> I mean... it's a bloody 7 character patch! At least some pointer
> would have been helpful. 
> 
> This is not a high-volume list, so to me it looks like people
> just don't give a rat's ass.  VERY disappointing, guys. 

What about actually sending the patch instead of attaching tarballs?