From: Kai Weber Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Are there problems with same VG on same hard disk? Message-ID: <20030409123606.GA1752@glorybox> References: <20030409112739.GA1244@glorybox> <1899663439.20030409133243@tnonline.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1899663439.20030409133243@tnonline.net> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Apr 9 07:36:02 2003 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 01:32:43PM +0200, Anders Widman wrote: > Why would you want to do that? One of the major benefits with LVM is > that you do not have to divide your physical disks into partitions, > but to do that through LVM. Also, performance-wise it is not a good > idea to do what you suggested. I have removed Windows from a partition. So it is now empty and could be used an included in the VG. If it's possible to resize the partitions... /dev/hda7 1923 2520 4803403+ 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda8 2521 3198 5446003+ 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda9 3199 9729 52460226 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda7 is VG system, /dev/hda9 is VG data and /dev/hda8 the new and empty partition. I have no space to backup /dev/hda9 for merging hda8 and hda9. There seems to be no "pvresize" for LVM1. Kai