From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: patch doesn't apply cleanly on 2.4.22 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:23:20 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20031216192320.GF14031@poupinou.org> References: <20031215183708.GA656@kukaracha.sotano> <1071516958.30492.64.camel@dell.linux.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1071516958.30492.64.camel@dell.linux.box> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: AthlonRob Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:35:58AM -0800, AthlonRob wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 10:37, paul wisehart wrote: > > > I have this patch: cpufreq-LINUX_2_4-20031212.tar.bz2 > > It won't patch cleanly onto a stock kernel.org 2.4.22 kernel-source. > > Paul: I don't remember exactly when the merge to 2.4.23 was done (look at the cpufreq archive, or use cvs log facility), but I think that cpufreq-LINUX_2_4-20031208.tar.bz2 is against 2.4.22. > > Before I get any further, can someone verify that this patch is for 2.4.22, or > > should I be using 2.4.23(, or something else?)? > > Hey Paul- > > I'm about 95% certain that patch isn't for 2.4.22... it's going to > either be for 2.4.23 or for 2.4.24-pre1. My money is on 2.4.23. You win ;) -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.