From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2.6] Add ported sensor chip driver: asb100 Message-Id: <20040109225858.32a2d4d6.khali@linux-fr.org> List-Id: References: <20040106051203.GK30841@earth.solarsys.private> In-Reply-To: <20040106051203.GK30841@earth.solarsys.private> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org > --- linux-2.6.1-rc1-orig/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile > +++ linux-2.6.1-rc1-mmh/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_W83781D) += w83781d.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1021) += adm1021.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_ASB100) += asb100.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_EEPROM) += eeprom.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_IT87) += it87.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_LM75) += lm75.o Shouldn't the asb100 be listed first, the same way the w83781d is, since it has subclients? I would even put asb100 before w83781d, since for now the w83781d driver will try to handle ASB100 chips too, thus preventing the asb100 driver from being used if both drivers are built-in. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/