Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i1LJqai14959 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:52:36 -0500 Received: from gaia.roc2.gblx.net (gaia.roc2.gblx.net [208.49.223.89]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i1LJqQb08985 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:52:36 -0500 From: Dan Foster Message-ID: <20040221195224.GA25784@gblx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [linux-lvm] LVM retirement? Sender: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat Feb 21 14:51:02 2004 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com I was discussing implementing LVM on upcoming Linux boxes with co-workers; one said he was reluctant to consider LVM because he had heard somewhere recently that LVM was to be dropped/retired soon, but couldn't remember where (or from whom) he'd seen/heard that mention. So, concerned, I dug around, and have not been able to find anything along these lines... and figured it was best to ask people who would be able to speak more authoritatively. Is LVM about to be dropped or retired any time soon (next 18 months)? If so, is there a replacement planned? Obviously, if that was just FUD, then we have nothing to worry about. I'm well aware of the benefits of a lvm, having run them on various commercial UNIX boxes for the past 10+ years, so I'm hoping that there's nothing to this unverified rumor. ;) -Dan