Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i2UC7Cj29787 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:07:12 -0500 Received: from net-m.de (h-213.61.219.37.host.de.colt.net [213.61.219.37]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i2UC7A1X026402 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:07:11 -0500 From: Wiktor Wodecki Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:06:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403301406.41500.wiktor.wodecki@net-m.de> Subject: [linux-lvm] does a snapshot change vg metadata? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Cc: Iulian Topliceanu Hello, we have a shared scsi system here with one vg and multiple lv's in it. Some lv's are mounted on machine A, others on machine B. I know that I must not make vg changes (like shrinking, deleteing, expanding, etc. an lv) while the vg is active on both machines. My question is whether this "limitation" also applies to snapshots - Can I take them while the vg is active on two machines or do I risk data corruption? I use latest lvm1 kernel patches on a 2.4.24 redhat 9.0 system. -- Regards, Wiktor Wodecki net mobile AG - 40470 Duesseldorf - Germany 923B DCF8 070C 9FDD 5E05 9AE3 E923 5A35 182C 9783