From: Nishanth Aravamudan Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:41:47 +0000 Subject: [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH 3/8] block/pf: replace pf_sleep() with Message-Id: <20040915184147.GK4363@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============78853907145520807==" List-Id: To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============78853907145520807== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Any comments would be appreciated. This is a re-push of a patch I submitted 20 July which hasn't been merged as of 2.6.9-rc1-mm5/2.6.9-rc2. Description: msleep_interruptible() is used instead of pf_sleep() to guarantee the task delays as expected. The defintion of pf_sleep() is also removed. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan --- 2.6.9-rc2-vanilla/drivers/block/paride/pf.c 2004-09-13 17:16:05.000000000 -0700 +++ 2.6.9-rc2/drivers/block/paride/pf.c 2004-09-14 11:49:47.000000000 -0700 @@ -526,12 +526,6 @@ static void pf_eject(struct pf_unit *pf) #define PF_RESET_TMO 30 /* in tenths of a second */ -static void pf_sleep(int cs) -{ - current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; - schedule_timeout(cs); -} - /* the ATAPI standard actually specifies the contents of all 7 registers after a reset, but the specification is ambiguous concerning the last two bytes, and different drives interpret the standard differently. @@ -546,11 +540,11 @@ static int pf_reset(struct pf_unit *pf) write_reg(pf, 6, 0xa0+0x10*pf->drive); write_reg(pf, 7, 8); - pf_sleep(20 * HZ / 1000); + msleep_interruptible(20); k = 0; while ((k++ < PF_RESET_TMO) && (status_reg(pf) & STAT_BUSY)) - pf_sleep(HZ / 10); + msleep_interruptible(100); flg = 1; for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) --===============78853907145520807== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============78853907145520807==--