From: NeilBrown Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 0 of 18] Introduction Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:54:52 +1000 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040924145130.2689.patches@notabene> Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CAi7E-00089t-VA for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:55:28 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.edu.au ([129.94.242.24] ident=root) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CAi7C-0008Jb-Ql for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:55:28 -0700 To: Andrew Morton Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Following are 18 patches against nfsd in 2.6.lastest. They are mostly nfsv4 related with patch 2 being the exception (It is just a code-cleanup patch). Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 1 of 18] nfsd4 fix: nfsd oopsed when encountering a conflict with a local lock Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 2 of 18] separate a little of logic from fh_verify into new function Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 3 of 18] nfsd4: don't take i_sem around call to ->getxattr Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 4 of 18] make sure getxattr inode op is non-NULL before calling it Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 5 of 18] nfsd4: reference count stateowners Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 6 of 18] nfsd4: take a reference to preserve stateowner through xdr replay code Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 7 of 18] nfsd4: revert awkward extension of state lock over xdr for replay encoding Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 8 of 18] nfsd4: fix race in xdr encoding of lock_denied response. Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 9 of 18] remove incorrect stateid modification in nfsv4 open upgrade Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 10 of 18] nfsd4: move open owner checks from nfsd4_process_open2 into new function Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 11 of 18] nfsd4_open_locktype_posix_flag Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 12 of 18] nfsd4: move seqid decrement on reclaim to separate function Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 13 of 18] nfsd4: reorganize "if" in nfsd4_process_open2 to make test clearer Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 14 of 18] nfsd4: move open_upgrade code into a separate function Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 15 of 18] nfsd4: move some nfsd4_process_open2 code to nfs4_new_open Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 16 of 18] Clean up nfsd4_process_open2 Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 17 of 18] nfsd4: fix putrootfh return Subject: [PATCH kNFSd 18 of 18] nfsd4: move code to truncate on open to separate function NeilBrown ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs