From: Herve Eychenne Subject: Re: [PATCH] note owner match brokenness Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 21:43:30 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20041003194330.GG2823@eychenne.org> References: <20041001204447.GA30390@linuxace.com> <415DC791.3060409@trash.net> <20041001211251.GA30542@linuxace.com> <415DCC5E.2030407@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415DCC5E.2030407@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 11:30:06PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Phil Oester wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 11:09:37PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >=20 > > > >>If we warn in userspace, we should warn when then options are used > >>instead of in the helptext. > >> =20 > >> > > > >Agreed, but do we want to: > > > > 1) warn on every single use of owner match? > > 2) have iptables determine if we are running on an SMP box, and > > only warn in that case? > > > >I didn't think either of these were terribly appealing. > >=20 > > > Agreed, I'm going to apply your patch. Thanks. Please apply the same to the manpage! Herve --=20 _ (=B0=3D Herv=E9 Eychenne //) v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/