From: =?utf-8?q?Micha=C5=82_Pytasz?= Subject: Re: Can you please try this powernow-k8.c patch ? Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:15:33 +0000 Message-ID: <200411162215.33814.mpytasz@pai.net.pl> References: <200411161753.11367.mpytasz@pai.net.pl> <20041116204703.GA9138@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20041116204703.GA9138@dominikbrodowski.de> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="macroman" To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk > AFAICS, your system only supports two frequency states with different > voltages. Also, the powernow-k8 driver complains if one transition > (frequency or voltage) fails. So you can be quite sure that the voltage > changes as well. OK, thanks, I believe You are right. Although I can see frequencies in betw= een=20 800 and 1600 in the debug log for powernowd-k8, they do not seem to affect= =20 cpuinfo_curr_freq (dummy values ?). Micha=C5=82