From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare)
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:25:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2.6] new sensors driver: SMSC LPC47B397-NC
Message-Id: <20050104185650.38be86a8.khali@linux-fr.org>
List-Id: <lm-sensors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20050102212924.GB17759@jupiter.solarsys.private>
In-Reply-To: <20050102212924.GB17759@jupiter.solarsys.private>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org

Hi Mark,

> How about this:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Craig Kelly (In-Store Broadcasting Network)
> Signed-off-by: Glenn Ball (Utilitek Systems, Inc.)
> Signed-off-by: Mark M. Hoffman <mhoffman@lightlink.com>
> 
> The first two aren't going to maintain the driver anyway, but I want
> the signatures there as contributor of the datasheet and holder of the
> copyright, respectively.  If I'm going to "sign-off" that I am allowed
> to distribute this work, then I also want to include from whom this
> permission came.  Linus wrote [1]:
> 
> > The above also allows for companies that have "release criteria" to
> > have the company "release person" sign off on a patch, so that a
> > company can easily incorporate their own internal release procedures
> > and see that all the patches have gone through the right channel.
> > [...]
> 
> Therefore, I think Linus intended for us to be able to sign off this
> way.

Fine with me! But Greg decides, of course.

-- 
Jean Delvare
http://khali.linux-fr.org/