From: stefan@desire.ch (Stefan Ott) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:25:32 +0000 Subject: [patch] fscpos driver Message-Id: <20050120175048.GL26072@desire.ch> List-Id: References: <20050104185338.3296d72d.khali@linux-fr.org> In-Reply-To: <20050104185338.3296d72d.khali@linux-fr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Jean On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 06:41:19PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hmm, wouldn't it more efficient to multiply all "mult" constants by 10 > directly? Indeed, you're right. So here we go: --- fscpos.c-orig 2005-01-20 03:49:05.000000000 +0100 +++ fscpos.c 2005-01-20 18:44:53.000000000 +0100 @@ -244,19 +244,19 @@ static ssize_t show_volt_12(struct device *dev, char *buf) { struct fscpos_data *data = fscpos_update_device(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[0], 1420)); + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[0], 14200)); } static ssize_t show_volt_5(struct device *dev, char *buf) { struct fscpos_data *data = fscpos_update_device(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[1], 660)); + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[1], 6600)); } static ssize_t show_volt_batt(struct device *dev, char *buf) { struct fscpos_data *data = fscpos_update_device(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[2], 330)); + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[2], 3300)); } /* Watchdog */ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20050120/c10b535b/attachment.bin