Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Dl7HS-0007Ag-WA for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:36:47 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dl7HM-00075x-5r for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:36:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dl7HI-00073n-Az for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:36:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dl7HI-000738-58 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:36:36 -0400 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dl7Gt-0003FG-SF for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:36:12 -0400 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8CEFE86F1B for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:32:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=ip6-localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 22 Jun 05 15:32:53 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:30:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050621231410.GA26213@miracle> <87ekauejnh.fsf@student.han.nl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506221730.42997.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: [patch] printf long format X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:36:45 -0000 On Wednesday 22 June 2005 16:33, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > You have made this comment a few times now. Please understand: I do > watch out for this stuff, apparently more carefully than other > committers. I am removing whitespace from an otherwise blank line. > > I am not saying I will never accidentally check in errant whitespace, > but you can see that this is a correction, not an accident. Why does Marco complain about this? Because of the readability of a patch? In this case, the option --ignore-space-change to diff would help you... Okuji