From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] OCFS2 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:29:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20050623202906.39c8ec8a.pj@sgi.com> References: <20050518223303.GE1340@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20050623200524.298a6ab4.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jmorris@redhat.com, mark.fasheh@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, wim.coekaerts@oracle.com, lmb@suse.de Return-path: Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:46984 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263034AbVFXD1I (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:27:08 -0400 To: Paul Jackson In-Reply-To: <20050623200524.298a6ab4.pj@sgi.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org A couple more random questions: 1) How does this lock manager relate to the Red Hat lock manager, the dlm-* patches? Note as an aside that dlm-* has 23 patches for a total of 14 thousand lines, or about 600 lines per patch. This is rather different than burying a lock manager into a 45 thousand line new file system patch ;) 2) Would a diffstat be a useful addition to this patch? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401