From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC] Mobile IPv6 introduction Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060802.141401.105110100.davem@davemloft.net> References: <44D01AEE.3030606@linux-ipv6.org> <20060802104756.GN8334@innerghost.net> <44D0A294.5000208@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hsantos@av.it.pt, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, anttit@tcs.hut.fi, vnuorval@tcs.hut.fi, netdev@vger.kernel.org, usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:25504 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932176AbWHBVNw (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:13:52 -0400 To: nakam@linux-ipv6.org In-Reply-To: <44D0A294.5000208@linux-ipv6.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Masahide NAKAMURA Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 22:03:16 +0900 > If there is much requirement to add new type number without any > modification of kernel code at all I would support ICMPv6 filter > approach, too. There is no such requirement, please just continue to prepare your current patches for inclusion. There is a limit to how much nit-picking we can do for such a large body of work, and we should thus take evolutionary approach to this work. We can make all kinds of refinements later to improve the implementation.