From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [2.6.19 PATCH 3/7] ehea: queue management Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:16:51 +0200 Message-ID: <200608181816.52079.arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Q Klein , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev , linux-kernel , Christoph Raisch , Marcus Eder , tklein@linux.ibm.com, abergman@de.ibm.com, Arjan van de Ven Return-path: To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Friday 18 August 2006 16:24, Christoph Raisch wrote: > And as always in performance tuning... one size fits all unfortunately is > not the correct answer. Ah, good. What is the maximum sensible value that you came up with? > Therefore we'll leave that open to the user as most other new ethernet > driver did as well. Sure. The interesting question is whether you want to allow users to set it to a value that is no longer sensible to do with __get_free_pages() and requires vmalloc(). Arnd <><