From: Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH] RM9000 serial driver Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:15:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20060830121528.GB25699@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200608102318.52143.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> <200608220057.52213.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> <20060822095942.4663a4cd.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> <200608260038.13662.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([217.147.92.249]:52237 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbWH3MPf (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:15:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608260038.13662.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Koeller Cc: Yoichi Yuasa , sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:38:13AM +0200, Thomas Koeller wrote: > so far nobody commented on my recent mail, in which I explained why I > think that the AU1X00 code in 8250.c is not entirely correct, so I assume > nobody cares. Or maybe your assumption is wrong. You were referring to the port type not being setup at autodetect time, and assuming that is used to define the register mapping. It isn't, so your premise for it being broken is incorrect. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core