From: Adrian Bunk Date: Fri Jan 26 10:49:38 2007 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [2.6 patch] fix OCFS2 compile error In-Reply-To: <45B965EA.20106@eyal.emu.id.au> References: <45B89008.9000809@eyal.emu.id.au> <45B965EA.20106@eyal.emu.id.au> Message-ID: <20070126184942.GP17836@stusta.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Eyal Lebedinsky , Mark Fasheh Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , kurt.hackel@oracle.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 01:22:34PM +1100, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > I should have added that this is on Debian stable: > $ gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13) > > Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > > i386 > > Practically all modules selected. > > > > Building modules, stage 2. > > MODPOST 1931 modules >... > > WARNING: "__udivdi3" [fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.ko] undefined! > > make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 Thanks for your report. I don't know why gcc 3.3 generates this now since ocfs2_backup_super_blkno() seems to be unused, but there is a bug for 32 bit systems that should be fixed: Commit 50af94b14c98f5769860a282a397c6f3b135c8a8 adds: offset /= sb->s_blocksize; That is: u64 = u64 / long Not a problem on 64bit architectures, but obviously a problem on 32 bit architectures. This patch fixes it by using sb->s_blocksize_bits instead of sb->s_blocksize. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk --- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h +++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static inline u64 ocfs2_backup_super_blkno(struct super_block *sb, int index) if (index >= 0 && index < OCFS2_MAX_BACKUP_SUPERBLOCKS) { offset <<= (2 * index); - offset /= sb->s_blocksize; + offset >>= sb->s_blocksize_bits; return offset; }