Return-Path: From: Arnd Bergmann To: cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, maynardj@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH 2/4] Add support to OProfile for profiling Cell BE SPUs -- update Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:08:56 +0100 References: <45BE4ED0.5030808@us.ibm.com> <45BE4F55.8070801@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <45BE4F55.8070801@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200701300508.56467.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday 29 January 2007 20:47, Maynard Johnson wrote: > The code was setting up the debug bus for group 21 when profiling on th= e=20 > event PPU CYCLES. =A0The debug bus is not actually used by the hardware=20 > performance counters when counting PPU CYCLES. =A0Setting up the debug bus > for PPU CYCLES causes signal routing conflicts on the debug bus when=20 > profiling PPU cycles and another PPU event. =A0This patch fixes the code = to=20 > only setup the debug bus to route the performance signals for the non > PPU CYCLE events. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Maynard Johnson > Signed-off-by: Carl Love Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Any suggestion for a one-line patch title?