From: "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] sprintf -> snprintf transition
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:31:00 +0100
Message-ID: <200701301631.00159.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


Hi!

I did the changes to finally remove all users of sprintf().
It does not remove sprintf(). I leave this to Keir.


patch 1/2:
Cleanup for x86. Bound calculation was not quite correct.

patch 2/2:
ia64/ppc: The sprintf -> snprintf transition.
Warning: Due to lack of hw, these have not been compiled tested.
IA64 and PPC maintainers, please verify!!

Christoph