From: William Lee Irwin III Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:59:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity Message-Id: <20070310105903.GA8915@holomorphy.com> List-Id: References: <20070310081743.GC23144@Krystal> <20070310082646.GC2994@holomorphy.com> <20070310.002944.115909724.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20070310.002944.115909724.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Miller Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mbligh@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:26:46 -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance, >> something like: On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:29:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some > consensus here :) It's just a minor touch-up. If Mathieu is okay with it, I'd rather leave him as the author and just send along an Acked-by: with it. I'm not terribly attached to it, either. I just choked on my soda when I saw set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(fpt), TI_USEDFPU) etc. go by. (Which reminds me, I really need to figure out how to consolidate the UP and SMP cases for all this.) -- wli